BitTorrent Subpoena & Lawsuit Defense

Spectrum

by

Strike 3 Holdings Files More Federal Lawsuits in California, Connecticut, and Florida

What has Strike 3 Filed?

Notorious copyright Plaintiff, Strike 3 Holdings, has filed 8 more federal lawsuits in California (6 cases), Connecticut (1 case), and Florida (1 case). Normally, handling so many lawsuits at once could be a daunting task, but it’s standard practice for Strike 3. Each lawsuit is nearly identical, alleging that an investigator recorded an IP address infringing on Strike 3’s copyrights by downloading Vixen, Tushy, or Blacked films through BitTorrent networks. They then ask the courts to grant a subpoena for the name of the internet account holder behind the IP address. 

Motions to Quash

When an internet service provider, such as Comcast Cable, Frontier Communications, and Spectrum, receives the subpoena, they’re obligated to alert the subscriber. This is when most people find out about the lawsuit and the need to file a Motion to Quash to challenge the subpoena. 

If you’re considering a Motion to Quash, please contact me. I’ve defended over 1,000 people against plaintiffs like Strike 3 Holdings, and have significant experience with Motions to Quash. I can help explain when they can be helpful, and when they could be potentially harmful. 

What Should I Do?

Although Strike 3 files hundreds of lawsuits every year, they take each one seriously, and the consequences can be significant. If not defended against, these lawsuits can have damages of at least $750 per infringement, but the Plaintiff can ask for more. This can make a typical Strike 3 Holdings case worth $10,000s, if not $100,000s in damages. These cases shouldn’t be ignored. Recently in New York, Strike 3 Holdings won a $108,750 default judgement against a defendant who did not defend themselves in court.

The Plaintiff is often willing to settle or even dismiss the case when a defendant has an adequate defense. That’s why it’s so important to contact an experienced attorney right away. I can provide valuable information based on my years of experience. I work with a team of lawyers to ensure that I can represent you, no matter where you are. If you contact my office, you’ll be speaking with me directly. I strive to make sure that everyone who contacts me is informed, and understands their situation and all of the options available to them.

I can explain to you your options for defense, and recommend the best way forward for your situation. I’ve represented more than 1,000 people across the country, and I focus my practice on defending against BitTorrent-based lawsuits. I’m very familiar with this Plaintiff and opposing counsel, including Lincoln Bandlow, Jacqueline James, and Tyler Mamone. I can give you individualized guidance for your case.

[Read more…] about Strike 3 Holdings Files More Federal Lawsuits in California, Connecticut, and Florida

by

Strike 3 Holdings Hits California with 9 More Federal Lawsuits

The holiday season hasn’t slowed down the notorious copyright Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings. In December, Strike 3 filed 9 new Federal lawsuits in California. For any other Plaintiff, this could be a daunting task, but it’s standard practice for Strike 3. Each lawsuit is nearly identical, alleging that an investigator recorded an IP address infringing on Strike 3’s copyrights by downloading Vixen, Tushy, or Blacked films through BitTorrent networks. They then ask the courts to grant a subpoena for the name of the internet account holder behind the IP address. 

The argument that the person that downloaded the films is the same as the subscriber is tenuous at best. Many people have households with shared internet connections. Others may have left their wifi unsecured or used a weak password, leaving them vulnerable to unauthorized access. Yet, the allegation that the subscriber may be the infringer is often enough for courts to grant a subpoena. 

When an internet service provider, such as AT&T U-verse, Comcast, or Spectrum, receives the subpoena, they’re obligated to alert the subscriber. This is when most people find out about the lawsuit and the need to file a Motion to Quash to challenge the subpoena and stop their identity from being released. 

If you’re considering a Motion to Quash, please contact me. I’ve defended over 1,000 people against plaintiffs like Strike 3 Holdings, and have significant experience with Motions to Quash. I can help explain when they can be helpful, and when they could be potentially harmful. 

Although Strike 3 files hundreds of lawsuits every year, they take each one seriously, and the consequences can be significant. If not defended against, these lawsuits can have damages of at least $750 per infringement, but the Plaintiff can ask for more. This can make a typical Strike 3 Holdings case worth $10,000s, if not $100,000s in damages. These cases shouldn’t be ignored.

The Plaintiff is often willing to settle or even dismiss the case when a defendant has an adequate defense. That’s why it’s so important to contact an experienced attorney right away. I can provide valuable information based on my years of experience. I work with a team of lawyers to ensure that I can represent you, no matter where you are. If you contact my office, you’ll be speaking with me directly. I strive to make sure that everyone who contacts me is informed, and understands their situation and all of the options available to them.

I can explain to you your options for defense, and recommend the best way forward for your situation. I’ve represented more than 1,000 people across the country, and I focus my practice on defending against BitTorrent-based lawsuits. I’m very familiar with this Plaintiff and opposing counsel, Lincoln Bandlow, and can give you individualized guidance for your case.

[Read more…] about Strike 3 Holdings Hits California with 9 More Federal Lawsuits

by

Strike 3 Holdings Files 26 More Cases in New York

December hasn’t slowed down Strike 3, as they continue to file dozens of lawsuits, including 26 more in New York. For any other Plaintiff, this could be overwhelming, but it’s standard practice for Strike 3. Each lawsuit is nearly identical, alleging that an investigator recorded an IP address infringing on Strike 3’s copyrights by downloading Vixen, Tushy, or Blacked films through BitTorrent networks. They then ask the courts to grant a subpoena for the name of the internet account holder behind the IP address. 

The argument that the person that downloaded the films is the same as the subscriber is tenuous at best. Many people have households with shared internet connections. Others may have left their wifi unsecured or used a weak password, leaving them vulnerable to unauthorized access. Yet, the allegation that the subscriber may be the infringer is often enough for courts to grant a subpoena. 

When an internet service provider, such as Spectrum and Verizon, receives the subpoena, they’re obligated to alert the subscriber. This is when most people find out about the lawsuit and the need to file a Motion to Quash to challenge the subpoena and stop their identity from being released. 

If you’re considering a Motion to Quash, please contact me. I’ve defended over 1,000 people against plaintiffs like Strike 3 Holdings, and have significant experience with Motions to Quash. I can help explain when they can be helpful, and when they could be potentially harmful. I work with a team of lawyers from across the country to make sure that we can serve you, no matter where you are. I’m also admitted to multiple Federal New York District Courts.

Although Strike 3 files hundreds of lawsuits every year, they take each one seriously, and the consequences can be significant. If not defended against, these lawsuits can have damages of at least $750 per infringement, but the Plaintiff can ask for more. This can make a typical Strike 3 Holdings case worth $10,000s, if not $100,000s in damages. These cases shouldn’t be ignored.

The Plaintiff is often willing to settle or even dismiss the case when a defendant has an adequate defense. That’s why it’s so important to contact an experienced attorney right away. I can provide valuable information based on my years of experience.

I can explain to you your options for defense, and recommend the best way forward for your situation. I’ve represented more than 1,000 people across the country, and I focus my practice on defending against BitTorrent-based lawsuits. I’m very familiar with this Plaintiff and opposing counsel, Jacqueline James, and can give you individualized guidance for your case.

[Read more…] about Strike 3 Holdings Files 26 More Cases in New York

by

5 New Federal Strike 3 Holdings Cases in New Jersey

Strike 3 Holdings has filed 5 new Federal copyright lawsuits in New Jersey in one day! Typically, this would be a daunting task for a Plaintiff, but Strike 3 isn’t typical. They’re one of the most prolific copyright Plaintiffs in the country. Each lawsuit is nearly identical, alleging that their investigators observed an IP address downloading Vixen, Tushy, or Blacked films through BitTorrent networks. They accuse the internet subscriber associated with the IP address as being the copyright infringer, and subpoena the Internet Service Provider (e.g., AT&T, Comcast, Cox, Spectrum, Optimum Online, RCN, Verizon, etc.) for the subscriber’s identity.

The argument that the person that pays the internet bill must also be the copyright infringer is weak. Other people may have had access to the internet connection, including guests, other family members, and unauthorized users. Yet, this barebones accusation is usually enough for Federal judges. Strike 3 Holdings has weaponized the copyright act to try to extract the largest settlements they can from internet subscribers, and they are notoriously aggressive.

That’s because this Plaintiff sees each infringement as worth at least $750 in statutory copyright damages, which they often ask to treble to $2,250 for what they see as “willful infringement”. Strike 3 Holdings cases, if lost in court, could easily cost $10,000s, or even $100,000s. The Plaintiff also targets wealthier neighborhoods, hoping to ensnare people who can secure substantial settlements. However, the Plaintiff is often willing to settle for less or even dismiss the case when a defendant has an adequate defense. That’s why it’s so important to contact an experienced attorney right away. I can provide valuable information based on my years of experience with Strike 3, help develop the best defense strategy for your situation, and help you reach a resolution.

Many people discover the lawsuit after they receive a notice from their ISP, which advises them that the only way to fight the subpoena is through a Motion to Quash (i.e., a motion to cancel the subpoena). In fact, many of these cases started out in county court in Miami-Dade, Florida, where people have been dismissed from their case after filing a Motion to Quash. However, Motions to Quash in Federal cases are not as simple, as Strike 3 usually files in the correct jurisdiction, leaving fewer arguments against the subpoena. 

If you’re considering a Motion to Quash, please contact me. I’ve defended over 1,000 people against plaintiffs like Strike 3 Holdings and have significant experience with Motions to Quash. I can help explain when they can be helpful, and when they could be potentially harmful. I work with a team of lawyers from across the country to provide the best defense, regardless of the state you live in.

I’m happy to explain to you your options for defense and recommend the best way forward for your situation. I’ve represented more than 1,000 people across the country, and I focus my practice on defending against BitTorrent-based lawsuits. I’m very familiar with this Plaintiff and can give you individualized guidance for your case.

[Read more…] about 5 New Federal Strike 3 Holdings Cases in New Jersey

by

Strike 3 Holdings Files 25 New Copyright Cases in California in One Day!

Strike 3 Holdings has filed 25 new Federal copyright lawsuits in California in one day! Typically, this would be a daunting task for a Plaintiff, but Strike 3 is not typical. They’re one of the most prolific copyright Plaintiffs in the country. Each lawsuit is nearly identical, alleging that their investigators observed an IP address downloading Vixen, Tushy, or Blacked films through BitTorrent networks. They then accuse the internet subscriber associated with the IP address as being the copyright infringer and subpoena the Internet Service Provider (e.g., AT&T, Comcast, Cox, Spectrum, Verizon, etc.) for the subscriber’s identity.

The argument that the person that pays the internet bill must also be the copyright infringer is weak. Other people may have had access to the internet connection, including guests, other family members, and unauthorized users. Yet, the barebones accusation that the subscriber is responsible is often enough for Federal judges. Strike 3 Holdings has weaponized this process to try to extract the largest settlements they can from internet subscribers, and they are notoriously aggressive.

That’s because this Plaintiff sees each infringement as worth at least $750 in statutory copyright damages, which they often ask to treble to $2,250 for what they see as “willful infringement”. Strike 3 Holdings cases, if lost in court, could easily cost $10,000s, or even $100,000s. The Plaintiff also targets wealthier neighborhoods, hoping to ensnare people who can secure substantial settlements. However, the Plaintiff is often willing to settle for less or even dismiss the case when a defendant has an adequate defense. That’s why it’s so important to contact an experienced attorney right away.

Many people discover the lawsuit after they receive a notice from their ISP, which advises them that the only way to fight the subpoena is through a Motion to Quash (i.e., a motion to cancel or “quash” the subpoena). In fact, many of these cases started out in county court in Miami-Dade, Florida, where people have had success in being dismissed from their case after filing a Motion to Quash. However, Motions to Quash in Federal cases are not as simple, as Strike 3 usually files in the correct jurisdiction, leaving fewer arguments against the subpoena. 

If you’re considering a Motion to Quash, please contact me. I’ve defended over 1,000 people against plaintiffs like Strike 3 Holdings and have significant experience with Motions to Quash. I can help explain when they can be helpful, and when they could be potentially harmful. I work with a team of lawyers from across the country to provide the best defense, regardless of the state you live in.

If you’ve received a notice from your internet service provider, please contact me. I can explain your options for defense and recommend the best way forward for your situation. I’ve represented more than 1,000 people across the country, and I focus my practice on defending against BitTorrent based lawsuits. I’m very familiar with this Plaintiff and can give you individualized guidance for your case.

[Read more…] about Strike 3 Holdings Files 25 New Copyright Cases in California in One Day!

by

Strike 3 Holdings Files 8 New Cases in California

Strike 3 Holdings has filed 18 new Federal copyright lawsuits in California in less than a week. Normally, this would be daunting, but this is normal for Strike 3, one of the most prolific copyright Plaintiffs in the country. Each lawsuit is nearly identical, alleging that their investigators observed an IP address downloading Vixen, Tushy, or Blacked films through BitTorrent networks. They then accuse the internet subscriber associated with the IP address as being the copyright infringer and subpoena the Internet Service Provider (e.g., AT&T, Comcast, Cox, Spectrum, Verizon, etc.) for the subscriber’s identity.

The argument that the person that pays the internet bill must also be the copyright infringer is weak. Other people may have had access to the internet connection, including guests, other family members, and unauthorized users. Yet, the barebones accusation that the subscriber is responsible is often enough for Federal judges. Strike 3 Holdings has weaponized this process to try to extract the largest settlements they can from internet subscribers, and they are notoriously aggressive.

The Plaintiff sees each infringement as worth at least $750 in statutory copyright damages, which they often ask to treble to $2,250 for what they see as “willful infringement”. Strike 3 Holdings cases, if lost in court, could easily cost $10,000s, or even $100,000s. However, the Plaintiff is often willing to settle for less or even dismiss the case when a defendant has an adequate defense. That’s why it’s so important to contact an experienced attorney right away.

Many people discover the lawsuit after they receive a notice from their ISP, which advises them that the only way to fight the subpoena is through a Motion to Quash (i.e., a motion to cancel or “quash” the subpoena). In fact, many of these cases started out in county court in Miami-Dade, Florida, where people have had success in being dismissed from their case after filing a Motion to Quash. However, Motions to Quash in Federal cases are not as simple, as Strike 3 usually files in the correct jurisdiction, leaving fewer arguments against the subpoena. 

If you’re considering a Motion to Quash, please contact me. I’ve defended over 1,000 people against plaintiffs like Strike 3 Holdings and have significant experience with Motions to Quash. I can help explain when they can be helpful, and when they could be potentially harmful. I work with a team of lawyers from across the country to provide the best defense, regardless of the state you live in.

If you’ve received a notice from your internet service provider, please contact me. I can explain your options for defense and recommend the best way forward for your situation. I’ve represented more than 1,000 people across the country, and I focus my practice on defending against BitTorrent based lawsuits. I’m very familiar with this Plaintiff and can give you individualized guidance for your case.

[Read more…] about Strike 3 Holdings Files 8 New Cases in California