• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Torrent Lawsuit Defense

  • Home
  • F.A.Q.
  • California
  • Colorado
  • Connecticut
  • D.C.
  • Florida
  • Illinois
  • Maryland
  • Michigan
  • New Jersey
  • New York
  • Ohio
  • Pennsylvania
  • Virginia

washington DC

January 22, 2021 by Leonard J. French

Strike 3 Holdings Files 17 More Federal Lawsuits in Virginia and Washington, DC

What has Strike 3 Filed?

Since December 30th, Strike 3 Holdings has filed more than 160 Federal cases, including 15 in Virginia and 2 in Washington, DC. For any other Plaintiff, handling so many lawsuits at once could be a daunting task, but it’s standard practice for Strike 3. Each lawsuit is nearly identical, alleging that an investigator recorded an IP address infringing on Strike 3’s copyrights by downloading Vixen, Tushy, or Blacked films through BitTorrent networks. They then ask the courts to grant a subpoena for the name of the internet account holder behind the IP address. 

Motions to Quash

When an internet service provider, such as Verizon, receives the subpoena, they’re obligated to alert the subscriber. This is when most people find out about the lawsuit and the need to file a Motion to Quash to challenge the subpoena. 

If you’re considering a Motion to Quash, please contact me. I’ve defended over 1,000 people against plaintiffs like Strike 3 Holdings, and have significant experience with Motions to Quash. I can help explain when they can be helpful, and when they could be potentially harmful. 

What Should I Do?

Although Strike 3 files hundreds of lawsuits every year, they take each one seriously, and the consequences can be significant. If not defended against, these lawsuits can have damages of at least $750 per infringement, but the Plaintiff can ask for more. This can make a typical Strike 3 Holdings case worth $10,000s, if not $100,000s in damages. These cases shouldn’t be ignored.

The Plaintiff is often willing to settle or even dismiss the case when a defendant has an adequate defense. That’s why it’s so important to contact an experienced attorney right away. I can provide valuable information based on my years of experience. I work with a team of lawyers to ensure that I can represent you, no matter where you are. If you contact my office, you’ll be speaking with me directly. I strive to make sure that everyone who contacts me is informed, and understands their situation and all of the options available to them.

I can explain to you your options for defense, and recommend the best way forward for your situation. I’ve represented more than 1,000 people across the country, and I focus my practice on defending against BitTorrent-based lawsuits. I’m very familiar with this Plaintiff and opposing counsel at Sciarrino & Shubert, PLLC, and can give you individualized guidance for your case.

[Read more…] about Strike 3 Holdings Files 17 More Federal Lawsuits in Virginia and Washington, DC

Filed Under: Bittorrent, By Plaintiff, Cases, Copyright, D.C., Federal, Florida, Motion to Quash, States, Strike 3 Holdings, Strike3 Holdings, Subpoena, Summons, Verizon Subpoena, Virginia Tagged With: bittorrent, copyright, file sharing, IP Address, lawsuit, motion to quash, strike 3 holdings, subpoena, summons, verizon, virginia, washington DC

January 9, 2021 by Leonard J. French

Strike 3 Holdings Subpoenas Identities of 186 Comcast Subscribers

What this Miami-Dade County Court Lawsuit Means

On December 30, 2020, Strike 3 Holdings filed its fifth case of the month (2020-031249-CC-05), in Miami-Dade County Court, this time to ask for subpoenas for an unbelievable 186 Comcast subscribers from across the country. Based on their IP addresses, we believe this represents people from California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Washington, DC. Strike 3 claims they documented 186 IP addresses committing copyright infringement by downloading Vixen, Tushy, or Blacked branded films through BitTorrent networks. 

So how is it that Strike 3 can sue so many people, from all across the country, in county court in Miami-Dade, Florida? Through a lesser known type of complaint called a Bill of Pure Discovery. They allege that the only relief they’re looking for is discovery, that is, a subpoena to the internet service provider (i.e., Comcast) for the identities of the internet subscribers behind each IP address.

Once the court grants the subpoenas, Comcast is obligated to respond unless the defendant files a Motion to Quash (i.e., a motion to cancel the subpoena).

Once Strike 3 has the internet subscriber’s identity, they will usually sue an adult male in the household claiming that he must be the infringer. These Federal lawsuits are serious and can have damages of at least $750 per infringement. This can make a typical Strike 3 Holdings case worth $10,000s, if not $100,000s in damages. These cases shouldn’t be ignored.

Can I just Ignore This?

Many people who receive a notice from their ISP wonder whether Strike 3 is actually serious about filing Federal lawsuits against those who refuse to settle the case. Many hope that Strike 3 will ignore or forget about them. Unfortunately, Strike 3 is one of the most prolific copyright plaintiffs in Federal Courts. In 2020, they filed almost 900 Federal cases, largely representing people who refused to settle when the case was first filed in Miami-Dade. Although Strike 3 often treats these lawsuits as an opportunity to make money through quick settlements, they are also willing to follow through in Federal court.

Motions to Quash

Given the serious nature of the allegations, many defendants want to pursue a Motion to Quash. This is understandable, and there are some valid arguments that while the case remains in Florida county court, such as arguing that the court doesn’t have jurisdiction over copyright matters, nor over non-Florida residents. However, this might not be the end of the case, as Strike 3 frequently files Federal lawsuits against those that oppose the subpoena.

If you’re considering a Motion to Quash, please contact me. I’ve defended over 1,000 people against plaintiffs like Strike 3 Holdings, and have significant experience with Motions to Quash. I can help explain when they can be helpful, and when they could be potentially harmful. I work with a team of lawyers from across the country to make sure that we can serve you, no matter where you are. 

How I Can Help

The Plaintiff is often willing to settle or even dismiss the case when a defendant has an adequate defense. That’s why it’s so important to contact an experienced attorney right away. I can provide valuable information based on my years of experience fighting Strike 3. I work with a team of lawyers from across the country to help represent you, no matter which state you come from.

I’m happy to explain to you your options for defense and recommend the best way forward for your situation, whether it be watching and waiting, settling, a motion to quash, or a fighting in court.  I’ve represented more than 1,000 people across the country, and I focus my practice on defending against BitTorrent-based lawsuits. I’m very familiar with this Plaintiff and can give you individualized guidance for your case.

[Read more…] about Strike 3 Holdings Subpoenas Identities of 186 Comcast Subscribers

Filed Under: Bittorrent, By Plaintiff, California, Cases, Colorado, Comcast Subpoena, Connecticut, Copyright, D.C., Federal, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Motion to Quash, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, States, Strike 3 Holdings, Strike3 Holdings, Subpoena, Summons, Virginia Tagged With: bittorrent, california, colorado, comcast, connecticut, copyright, district of columbia, file sharing, Florida, georgia, Illinois, IP Address, lawsuit, Maryland, massachusetts, miami-dade county court, Michigan, Minnesota, motion to quash, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, strike 3 holdings, subpoena, summons, Tennessee, texas, Utah, virginia, washington DC

January 2, 2021 by Leonard J. French

Strike 3 Holdings Files More Federal Lawsuits in Connecticut and Washington, D.C.

The holiday season hasn’t slowed down the notorious copyright Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings. In December, Strike 3 filed lawsuits in Connecticut and Washington, DC. These were just two lawsuits in a flurry of recent filings. For any other Plaintiff, handling so many lawsuits at once could be a daunting task, but it’s standard practice for Strike 3. Each lawsuit is nearly identical, alleging that an investigator recorded an IP address infringing on Strike 3’s copyrights by downloading Vixen, Tushy, or Blacked films through BitTorrent networks. They then ask the courts to grant a subpoena for the name of the internet account holder behind the IP address. 

The argument that the person that downloaded the films is the same as the subscriber is tenuous at best. Many people have households with shared internet connections. Others may have left their wifi unsecured or used a weak password, leaving them vulnerable to unauthorized access. Yet, the allegation that the subscriber may be the infringer is often enough for courts to grant a subpoena. 

When an internet service provider, such as Comcast or RCN, receives the subpoena, they’re obligated to alert the subscriber. This is when most people find out about the lawsuit and the need to file a Motion to Quash to challenge the subpoena and stop their identity from being released. 

If you’re considering a Motion to Quash, please contact me. I’ve defended over 1,000 people against plaintiffs like Strike 3 Holdings, and have significant experience with Motions to Quash. I can help explain when they can be helpful, and when they could be potentially harmful. 

Although Strike 3 files hundreds of lawsuits every year, they take each one seriously, and the consequences can be significant. If not defended against, these lawsuits can have damages of at least $750 per infringement, but the Plaintiff can ask for more. This can make a typical Strike 3 Holdings case worth $10,000s, if not $100,000s in damages. These cases shouldn’t be ignored.

The Plaintiff is often willing to settle or even dismiss the case when a defendant has an adequate defense. That’s why it’s so important to contact an experienced attorney right away. I can provide valuable information based on my years of experience. I work with a team of lawyers to ensure that I can represent you, no matter where you are. If you contact my office, you’ll be speaking with me directly. I strive to make sure that everyone who contacts me is informed, and understands their situation and all of the options available to them.

I can explain to you your options for defense, and recommend the best way forward for your situation. I’ve represented more than 1,000 people across the country, and I focus my practice on defending against BitTorrent-based lawsuits. I’m very familiar with this Plaintiff and opposing counsels, including Jacqueline James and the attorneys at Clark Hill, and can give you individualized guidance for your case.

[Read more…] about Strike 3 Holdings Files More Federal Lawsuits in Connecticut and Washington, D.C.

Filed Under: Bittorrent, By Plaintiff, Cases, Comcast Subpoena, Connecticut, Copyright, D.C., Federal, Motion to Quash, States, Strike 3 Holdings, Strike3 Holdings, Subpoena, Summons Tagged With: bittorrent, comcast, connecticut, copyright, district of columbia, file sharing, IP Address, lawsuit, motion to quash, RCN, strike 3 holdings, subpoena, summons, washington DC

December 19, 2020 by Leonard J. French

Strike 3 Holdings Subpoenas Identities of 56 Comcast Subscribers From Across the Nation

Just 10 days before Christmas, Strike 3 Holdings has filed another case (2020-030127-CC-05), in Miami-Dade County Court, this time to ask for subpoenas for 56 Comcast subscribers across the country. This includes California (28 identities), Michigan (5 identities), Illinois (5 identities), Maryland (5 identities), New Jersey (5 identities), Washington, DC (3 identities), Pennsylvania (2 identities), and Connecticut (3 identities). Strike 3 claims these subscribers have committed copyright infringement by downloading Vixen, Tushy, or Blacked branded films through BitTorrent networks. Once the court grants the subpoena, Comcast is obligated to respond unless the defendant files a Motion to Quash (i.e., a motion to cancel the subpoena).

Once Strike 3 has the internet subscriber’s identity, they will usually sue an adult male in the household claiming that he must be the infringer. These Federal lawsuits are serious and can have damages of at least $750 per infringement. This can make a typical Strike 3 Holdings case worth $10,000s, if not $100,000s in damages. These cases shouldn’t be ignored.

Given the serious nature of the allegations, many defendants want to pursue a Motion to Quash. This is understandable, and there are some valid arguments while the case remains in Florida county court, such as arguing that the court doesn’t have jurisdiction over copyright matters, nor over non-Florida residents. However, this might not be the end of the case, as Strike 3 frequently files Federal lawsuits against those that oppose the subpoena.

If you’re considering a Motion to Quash, please contact me. I’ve defended over 1,000 people against plaintiffs like Strike 3 Holdings, and have significant experience with Motions to Quash. I can help explain when they can be helpful, and when they could be potentially harmful. I work with a team of lawyers from across the country to make sure that we can serve you, no matter where you are. 

The Plaintiff is often willing to settle or even dismiss the case when a defendant has an adequate defense. That’s why it’s so important to contact an experienced attorney right away. I can provide valuable information based on my years of experience fighting Strike 3.

I’m happy to explain to you your options for defense and recommend the best way forward for your situation. I’ve represented more than 1,000 people across the country, and I focus my practice on defending against BitTorrent-based lawsuits. I’m very familiar with this Plaintiff and can give you individualized guidance for your case.

[Read more…] about Strike 3 Holdings Subpoenas Identities of 56 Comcast Subscribers From Across the Nation

Filed Under: Bittorrent, By Plaintiff, California, Cases, Comcast Subpoena, Connecticut, Copyright, D.C., Federal, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Motion to Quash, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, States, Strike 3 Holdings, Strike3 Holdings, Subpoena, Summons Tagged With: bittorrent, california, comcast, connecticut, copyright, district of columbia, file sharing, Illinois, IP Address, lawsuit, Maryland, miami-dade county court, Michigan, motion to quash, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, strike 3 holdings, subpoena, summons, washington DC

December 7, 2020 by Leonard J. French

Strike 3 Holdings Subpoenas Identities of 101 Internet Subscribers Across the Nation

In their latest filing, case 2020-027925-CC-05 in Miami-Dade County Court, Strike 3 has targeted 101 more Internet Subscribers that Strike 3 claims have committed copyright infringement by downloading Vixen, Tushy, or Blacked branded films through BitTorrent networks. In just one filing, they’ve asked for subpoenas to Century Link, Cox, Frontier, Google Fiber, Optimum Online, RCN, and Wave Broadband, to force the ISPs to reveal their clients’ identities. Once the court grants the subpoena, the ISP is obligated to respond unless the defendant files a Motion to Quash (i.e., a motion to cancel the subpoena).

Once Strike 3 has the internet subscriber’s identity, they will usually sue an adult male in the household claiming that he must be the infringer. These Federal lawsuits are serious and can have damages of at least $750 per infringement. This can make a typical Strike 3 Holdings case worth $10,000s, if not $100,000s in damages. These cases shouldn’t be ignored.

Given the serious nature of the allegations, many defendants want to pursue a Motion to Quash. This is understandable, and there are some valid arguments while the case remains in Florida county court, such as arguing that the court doesn’t have jurisdiction over copyright matters, nor over non-Florida residents. However, this might not be the end of the case, as Strike 3 frequently files Federal lawsuits against those that oppose the subpoena.

If you’re considering a Motion to Quash, please contact me. I’ve defended over 1,000 people against plaintiffs like Strike 3 Holdings, and have significant experience with Motions to Quash. I can help explain when they can be helpful, and when they could be potentially harmful. I work with a team of lawyers from across the country to make sure that we can serve you, no matter where you are. For example, in the present case, Strike 3 subpoenaed identities of people from California, Texas, Virginia, Arizona, Washington, Nevada, New York, New Jersey, Maryland, Colorado, and Connecticut (to name a few).

The Plaintiff is often willing to settle or even dismiss the case when a defendant has an adequate defense. That’s why it’s so important to contact an experienced attorney right away. I can provide valuable information based on my years of experience fighting Strike 3.

I’m happy to explain to you your options for defense and recommend the best way forward for your situation. I’ve represented more than 1,000 people across the country, and I focus my practice on defending against BitTorrent-based lawsuits. I’m very familiar with this Plaintiff and can give you individualized guidance for your case.

[Read more…] about Strike 3 Holdings Subpoenas Identities of 101 Internet Subscribers Across the Nation

Filed Under: Bittorrent, By Plaintiff, California, Cases, Colorado, Connecticut, Copyright, Cox, D.C., Federal, Florida, Motion to Quash, New Jersey, New York, Optimum Online, States, Strike 3 Holdings, Strike3 Holdings, Subpoena, Summons, Virginia Tagged With: arizona, bittorrent, california, century link, colorado, connecticut, copyright, cox communications, district of columbia, file sharing, Florida, frontier communications, georgia, google fiber, IP Address, lawsuit, massachusetts, miami-dade county court, motion to quash, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, north carolina, optimum online, RCN, strike 3 holdings, subpoena, summons, Tennessee, texas, Utah, virginia, washington, washington DC, wave broadband

November 6, 2020 by Leonard J. French

Strike 3 Holdings Demands Identities of 77 Comcast Internet Subscribers

Strike 3 Holdings, one of the most prolific copyright Plaintiffs in the country, has filed a lawsuit in Miami-Dade County Court demanding subpoenas to find out the identity of 77 Comcast internet subscribers (Case 2020-025801-CC-05, filed November 2, 2020). They allege that an investigator observed the IP addresses downloading Strike 3 films, marketed under the brands Tushy, Vixen, and Blacked, through BitTorrent networks. These subscribers are from across the country, including California, Connecticut, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Washington, DC. Strike 3 has alleged that the internet subscriber associated with each IP address must be the alleged copyright infringer.

This is a tenuous argument at best, as there are many reasons why the subscriber might not be the infringer (e.g., someone else had access to the internet connection or the wifi was left unprotected). However, Miami-Dade county court judges routinely grant subpoenas to force internet service providers, like Comcast, to reveal the name of the accused internet subscriber.

It is possible to fight the subpoena through a Motion to Quash (i.e., a motion to cancel or “quash” the subpoena) because the case was filed in a state court, which lacks jurisdiction over copyright matters and non-Florida residents. However, that may not be the end of the case, as Strike 3 routinely files federal lawsuits against those that fight the subpoena. These federal cases as often in the right jurisdiction, making another motion to quash complicated.

If you’re considering a Motion to Quash, please contact me. I’ve defended over 1,000 people against plaintiffs like Strike 3 Holdings and have significant experience with Motions to Quash. I can help explain when they can be helpful and when they could be potentially harmful. I work with a team of lawyers from across the country to provide the best defense, regardless of the state you live in.

Strike 3 Holdings is notoriously aggressive in pursuing each case, and each allegation is serious. The Plaintiff sees each infringement as worth at least $750, which they often ask to treble to $2,250 for what they see as “willful infringement”. Strike 3 Holdings cases, if lost in court, could easily cost $10,000s, or even $100,000s. However, the Plaintiff is often willing to settle for less or even dismiss the case when a defendant has an adequate defense. This is why it’s so important to contact an experienced attorney right away.

If you’ve received a notice from your internet service provider, please contact me. I can explain your options for defense and recommend the best way forward for your situation. I’ve represented more than 1,000 people across the country, and I focus my practice on defending against BitTorrent based lawsuits. I’m very familiar with this Plaintiff and can give you individualized guidance for your case.

[Read more…] about Strike 3 Holdings Demands Identities of 77 Comcast Internet Subscribers

Filed Under: Bittorrent, By Plaintiff, California, Cases, Comcast Subpoena, Connecticut, Copyright, D.C., Federal, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Motion to Quash, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, States, Strike 3 Holdings, Strike3 Holdings, Subpoena, Summons, Virginia Tagged With: bittorrent, california, comcast, connecticut, copyright, district of columbia, file sharing, Florida, Illinois, IP Address, lawsuit, Maryland, miami-dade county court, Michigan, motion to quash, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, strike 3 holdings, summons, virginia, washington DC

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Subpoena or Summons?

Received a notice of a subpoena to your ISP? Received a federal court summons? Attorney & Counselor Leonard J. French can help.

Florida Pure Bill of Discovery? I can tell you what is going on and what you can do about it. Read more in my subpoena defense guide…

Motion to Quash

Your Notice from your ISP may tell you to file a “Motion to Quash”. I can tell you what that is and whether filing a Motion to Quash is the right decision for you.

Call now: (888) 801-8681

These cases are serious. I can answer your questions. I can help you sleep again.

I handle your case - personally - from start to finish. See for yourself: call and talk to me now.

Experience & Full Service

I have personally represented over one thousand defendants in bittorrent-based copyright lawsuits around the country, including Malibu Media’s first trial, the ‘bellwether’ trial.

Call me at (888) 801-8681 anytime. If I can’t answer, please leave a message and I will call you back as soon as I can – even nights and weekends.

I offer reasonable, flat rates for most circumstances. Most rates range from $1,200 to $2,500 depending on the complexity of the case.

Contact me now:

    “really helped me understand”

    "It was an awesome decision to ask for help regarding copyright defense from Leonard J French. His insight and advice helped me through the situation with no bumps in the road. His services are very fairly priced, and his initial, free phone consultation was much longer than I expected, which really helped me understand the situation at hand before we even began to talk money. I would highly recommend Mr. French for any legal matters his firm covers."
    - a Copyright client

    "If you are in need of a Lawyer, do not hesitate to hire Mr. French. Kind, Compassionate and Knowledgeable."
    - Andrew

    More Testimonials

    Notice of subpoena to ISP?

    If you have received a notice that your internet service provider has been subpoenaed in a lawsuit, you may still have time to protect your identity and keep your anonymity.

    Many defendants have to make the tough decision about fighting or settling their case. There are many details which determine the outcome of one of these cases.

    Call me now and I will help you understand where you are and how to best proceed.

    (888) 801-8681 anytime.

    Most Recent Updates

    • Strike 3 Holdings Files More Federal Lawsuits in California, Connecticut, and Florida February 8, 2021
    • Strike 3 Holdings Files 23 Federal Lawsuits in Texas February 6, 2021
    • Strike 3 Holdings Files 11 Federal Lawsuits in Illinois January 24, 2021
    • Strike 3 Holdings Files 14 Federal Lawsuits in Michigan January 23, 2021
    • Strike 3 Holdings Files 17 More Federal Lawsuits in Virginia and Washington, DC January 22, 2021
    • Strike 3 Holdings Files 19 More Federal Lawsuits in New York January 21, 2021
    • Strike 3 Holdings Files 23 Federal Lawsuits in New Jersey January 20, 2021
    • Strike 3 Holdings Files 14 More Federal Lawsuits in Maryland January 20, 2021
    • Strike 3 Holdings Files 15 Federal Lawsuits in Pennsylvania January 19, 2021
    • Strike 3 Holdings Files 54 More Federal Lawsuits in California January 18, 2021

    Case Update Calendar

    March 2021
    M T W T F S S
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    293031  
    « Feb    

    Footer

     
    Call now: 888-801-8681

    This is Attorney Advertising
    • Home
    • F.A.Q.
    • California
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • D.C.
    • Florida
    • Illinois
    • Maryland
    • Michigan
    • New Jersey
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Pennsylvania
    • Virginia

    Copyright © 2021 · Executive Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in