BitTorrent Subpoena & Lawsuit Defense

Call or Text Now

610-466-5644

Colorado

by

Strike 3 Holdings files 37 new cases in Colorado

The world’s largest copyright troll, Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, has filed an astonishing 1191 new cases since the end of May — 37 of which are lodged in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado.

Strike 3 is one of the only copyright plaintiffs to file lawsuits en-masse against alleged online file-sharing. They forego the sending of warning letters or takedown notices, preferring instead to wait for potential defendants to accumulate a minimum of 24 downloads or claims before Strike 3 files a lawsuit.

I have found myself at the cutting-edge of copyright litigation, having represented over 1,500 defendants and consulted with thousands more. I recently defended an innocent Strike 3 victim together with Curt Edmonson and Stephanie Reed-Traband – a case which ended favorably on the eve of a jury trial.

We are the only attorneys to ever take a Strike 3 defense that far.

I have developed effective strategies for dealing with Strike 3 lawsuits in the best ways possible. If you or someone you know has received a notice from their ISP about a Strike 3 subpoena or lawsuit, please contact me. I can help you understand what’s happening and how to limit the damage as much as possible.

I can be reached directly at 610-466-5644 by voice or text. My email address is ljfrench@torrentdefense.com. Contact me any time, day or night, and I’ll do my best to answer or get back to you promptly.

Thank you for your time. I look forward to hearing from you.

— Leonard French, Esq.

Strike 3 Holdings Has Filed 37 New Cases In Colorado Since The End Of May:

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.128.53.38 - 1-23-cv-01568 - DCO - 21/06/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 107.2.191.248 - 1-23-cv-01569 - DCO - 21/06/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.34.54.189 - 1-23-cv-01570 - DCO - 21/06/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 76.25.231.40 - 1-23-cv-01575 - DCO - 21/06/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.203.120.94 - 1-23-cv-01577 - DCO - 21/06/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 67.176.124.168 - 1-23-cv-01584 - DCO - 21/06/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.95.105.142 - 1-23-cv-01585 - DCO - 21/06/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.3.164.161 - 1-23-cv-01586 - DCO - 21/06/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 98.43.14.169 - 1-23-cv-01587 - DCO - 21/06/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 67.190.163.49 - 1-23-cv-01588 - DCO - 21/06/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 67.190.37.24 - 1-23-cv-01589 - DCO - 21/06/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 98.38.145.19 - 1-23-cv-01590 - DCO - 21/06/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 98.43.125.236 - 1-23-cv-01591 - DCO - 21/06/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 174.51.251.81 - 1-23-cv-01592 - DCO - 21/06/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.8.228.254 - 1-23-cv-01593 - DCO - 21/06/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe subscriber assigned IP address 98.43.195.203 - 1-23-cv-01889 - DCO - 26/07/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.243.28.158 - 1-23-cv-01892 - DCO - 26/07/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.229.61.167 - 1-23-cv-01894 - DCO - 26/07/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 67.172.145.73 - 1-23-cv-01898 - DCO - 26/07/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.34.219.56 - 1-23-cv-01900 - DCO - 26/07/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.9.174.236 - 1-23-cv-01901 - DCO - 26/07/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 67.165.208.114 - 1-23-cv-01902 - DCO - 26/07/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 71.237.104.226 - 1-23-cv-01905 - DCO - 26/07/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 75.71.166.65 - 1-23-cv-01907 - DCO - 26/07/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 76.120.35.103 - 1-23-cv-01908 - DCO - 26/07/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 71.205.140.93 - 1-23-cv-01909 - DCO - 26/07/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 174.51.147.233 - 1-23-cv-01910 - DCO - 26/07/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 98.50.29.166 - 1-23-cv-01911 - DCO - 26/07/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 76.154.177.39 - 1-23-cv-02133 - DCO - 22/08/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.229.52.200 - 1-23-cv-02134 - DCO - 22/08/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.181.53.214 - 1-23-cv-02135 - DCO - 22/08/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.8.187.34 - 1-23-cv-02136 - DCO - 22/08/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.153.0.247 - 1-23-cv-02468 - DCO - 22/09/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.153.119.6 - 1-23-cv-02469 - DCO - 22/09/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 67.164.166.203 - 1-23-cv-02471 - DCO - 22/09/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 174.51.216.9 - 1-23-cv-02473 - DCO - 22/09/2023
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.8.167.140 - 1-23-cv-02475 - DCO - 22/09/2023

by

Strike 3 Holdings Files 11 New Cases in Colorado

What has Strike 3 Filed?

Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings has filed 11 new Federal lawsuits in Colorado over just two days (March 24 and 27). This is part of a nationwide blitz of over 325 cases within the last few weeks. Normally, handling so many lawsuits across so many states at once would be a daunting task, but it’s standard practice for Strike 3. Each lawsuit is nearly identical, and alleges that an investigator recorded an IP address infringing on Strike 3’s copyrights by downloading Vixen, Tushy, or Blacked films through BitTorrent networks. Strike 3 then asks the court to grant a subpoena for the name of the internet account holder behind the IP address. 

Motions to Quash

When an internet service provider, such as Verizon Fios, Comcast, Spectrum, or Cox Communications receives the subpoena, they’re obligated to alert the subscriber. This is when most people find out about the lawsuit and the need to file a Motion to Quash to challenge the subpoena. 

If you’re considering a Motion to Quash, please contact me. I’ve defended over 1,000 people against plaintiffs like Strike 3 Holdings, and have significant experience with Motions to Quash. I can help explain when they can be helpful, and when they could be potentially harmful. 

What Should I Do?

Although Strike 3 files thousands of lawsuits every year, they take each one seriously, and the consequences can be significant. If not defended against, these lawsuits can have damages of at least $750 per infringement, but the Plaintiff can ask for more. This can make a typical Strike 3 Holdings case worth $10,000s, if not $100,000s in damages. These cases shouldn’t be ignored. Recently in New York, Strike 3 Holdings won a $108,750 default judgment against a defendant who did not defend themselves in court.

The Plaintiff is often willing to settle or even dismiss the case when a defendant has an adequate defense. That’s why it’s so important to contact an experienced attorney immediately. I can provide valuable information based on my years of experience. If you contact my office, you’ll be speaking with me directly. I strive to make sure that everyone who contacts me is informed, and understands their situation and all of the options available to them.

I can explain to you your options for defense, and recommend the best way forward for your situation. I’ve represented more than 1,000 people across the country, and I focus my practice on defending against BitTorrent-based lawsuits. I work with a team of lawyers to make sure that I can represent you, no matter where you are. I’m very familiar with this Plaintiff, and I can give you individualized guidance for your case.

[Read more…] about Strike 3 Holdings Files 11 New Cases in Colorado

by

Strike 3 Holdings Subpoenas Identities of 75 Internet Subscribers

What this Miami-Dade County Court Lawsuit Means

On May 24, 2021, Strike 3 Holdings filed a case (2021-016035-CC-05), in Miami-Dade County Court, to ask for subpoenas for 75 internet subscribers from various internet services (i.e., Google Fiber, Hotwire, Optimum Online, RCN, Sonic.net, and Webpass). Based on IP address geolocation, these subscribers are likely from all over the country, including Texas, California, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Florida, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Illinois (among others). Strike 3 claims that they recorded each IP address committing copyright infringement by downloading Vixen, Tushy, or Blacked branded films through BitTorrent networks. 

How Can Strike 3 Sue So Many People from Across the Country, in Miami-Dade, Florida?

Strike 3 uses a lesser known type of complaint called a Bill of Pure Discovery. They allege that the only relief they’re looking for is discovery, that is, a subpoena to the internet service provider for the identities of the internet subscribers behind each IP address.

Once the court grants the subpoenas, the ISP (e.g., Google fiber, Hotwire, Optimum Online, RCN, etc.) is obligated to respond unless the defendant files a Motion to Quash (i.e., a motion to cancel the subpoena).

Once Strike 3 has the internet subscriber’s identity, they will usually sue an adult male in the household claiming that he must be the infringer. These Federal lawsuits are serious and can have damages of at least $750 per infringement. This can make a typical Strike 3 Holdings case worth $10,000s, if not $100,000s in damages. These cases shouldn’t be ignored.

Can I just Ignore This?

Many people who receive a notice from their ISP wonder whether Strike 3 is actually serious about filing Federal lawsuits against those who refuse to settle the case. Many hope that Strike 3 will ignore or forget about them. Unfortunately, Strike 3 is one of the most prolific copyright plaintiffs in Federal Courts. In 2020, they filed almost 900 Federal cases, largely focusing on people who refused to settle when the case was first filed in Miami-Dade. Although Strike 3 often treats these lawsuits as an opportunity to make money through quick settlements, they are also willing to follow through in Federal court.

Motions to Quash

Given the serious nature of the allegations, many defendants want to pursue a Motion to Quash. This is understandable, and there are some valid arguments while the case remains in Florida county court, such as that the court doesn’t have jurisdiction over copyright matters, nor over non-Florida residents. However, this might not be the end of the case, as Strike 3 frequently files Federal lawsuits against those that oppose the subpoena.

If you’re considering a Motion to Quash, please contact me. I’ve defended over 1,000 people against plaintiffs like Strike 3 Holdings, and have significant experience with Motions to Quash. I can help explain when they can be helpful, and when they could be potentially harmful. I work with a team of lawyers from across the country to make sure that we can serve you, no matter where you are. 

How I Can Help

The Plaintiff is often willing to settle or even dismiss the case when a defendant has an adequate defense. That’s why it’s so important to contact an experienced attorney right away. I can provide valuable information based on my years of experience fighting Strike 3. I work with a team of lawyers from across the country to help represent you, no matter where you are.

I’m happy to explain to you your options for defense and recommend the best way forward for your situation, whether it be watching and waiting, settling, a motion to quash, or a fighting in court.  I’ve represented more than 1,000 people across the country, and I focus my practice on defending against BitTorrent-based lawsuits. I’m very familiar with this Plaintiff and can give you individualized guidance for your case.

[Read more…] about Strike 3 Holdings Subpoenas Identities of 75 Internet Subscribers