• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

BitTorrent Subpoena & Lawsuit Defense

Call or Text Now

610-466-5644

  • Home
  • F.A.Q.
  • California
  • Colorado
  • Connecticut
  • D.C.
  • Florida
  • Georgia
  • Hawaii
  • Illinois
  • Kentucky
  • Maryland
  • Massachusetts
  • Michigan
  • Minnesota
  • New Jersey
  • New York
  • North Carolina
  • Ohio
  • Pennsylvania
  • Tennessee
  • Texas
  • Virginia
  • Wisconsin

optimum online

July 2, 2019 by Leonard J. French

Malibu Media and Strike 3 Holdings File 35 Cases in New York

If You’ve Received a Notice from Strike 3 Holdings or Malibu Media – Read This

Thirty-five more BitTorrent-based copyright infringement lawsuits have been filed in New York by Malibu Media (7 cases) and Strike 3 Holdings (28 cases). Malibu Media owns the rights to X-Art brand films and Strike 3 Holdings operates Vixen, Tushy, and Blacked. For any other type of Plaintiff, mass-filing these lawsuits would be extraordinarily difficult. These Plaintiffs, however, file nearly identical lawsuits, only changing the IP address accused of infringement and the list of alleged infringements. They allege their investigators observed an IP address repeatedly downloading the Plaintiff’s copyrighted works through BitTorrent networks and then sues each IP address for copyright infringement.

However, an IP address is merely a unique identifier for an internet connection. In order to find the proper defendant (that is the person that downloaded the files), the Plaintiff subpoenas the Internet Service Provider (e.g., Charter/Spectrum, XFinity/Comcast, Optimum/Altice, RCN, Verizon, etc.) for the subscriber’s identity. Some judges have noted that it’s dubious to assume the internet subscriber (the person that pays the bill) is the same person who downloaded the material. After all, many homes have multiple people who use the same internet connection – and unauthorized use can occur. The subscriber may not even live at the residence the internet is being provided for.

Yet, courts across the country have granted tremendous leeway to Malibu Media and Strike 3 Holdings to allow them to get the identities of internet subscribers to try to find a person willing to pay a settlement. The settlement amounts are carefully calculated to be just below the cost of an effective defense.

Most subscribers find out about the lawsuit when they receive a notice from their Internet Service Provider (ISP) notifying them that the Plaintiff has subpoenaed the subscriber’s identity. The ISP is obligated to comply with the subpoena unless a Motion to Quash is filed. This is a court motion to void or “quash” the subpoena. However, Motions to Quash are complex in these cases as the subpoena is between the Plaintiff and the ISP, meaning the subscriber is a third party. I’m happy to discuss with you whether filing a Motion to Quash or alternative motions is advisable in your case.

If you’ve received one of these notices or have been served with the lawsuit, it’s vital to retain counsel without delay. There are timelines imposed by the court that must be adhered to in order to defend yourself. This Plaintiff is notoriously aggressive and an effective defense can help secure the best possible outcome for you. Failing to respond in court once you have been served can result in a default judgement against you. Default judgments typically involve ruling in the Plaintiff’s favor and awarding thousands of dollars in damages per infringement in addition to the Plaintiff’s legal fees and costs.

For more information on what these lawsuits mean for internet subscribers, please check out our FAQ section.

[Read more…] about Malibu Media and Strike 3 Holdings File 35 Cases in New York

Filed Under: Bittorrent, By Plaintiff, Cablevision Subpoena, Cases, Comcast Subpoena, Copyright, Cox, Federal, Malibu Media, Motion to Quash, New York, Optimum Online, States, Strike 3 Holdings, Strike3 Holdings, Subpoena, Summons, Time Warner Subpoena, Verizon Subpoena Tagged With: bittorrent, charter, comcast, cox, file sharing, lawsuit, malibu media, motion to quash, New York, optimum online, RCN, strike 3 holdings, summons, time warner, verizon

July 1, 2019 by Leonard J. French

Strike 3 Holdings Files 25 Cases in Pennsylvania in 1 Day

If You’ve Received a Notice from Strike 3 Holdings – Read This

Strike 3 Holdings has filed 25 BitTorrrent-based copyright infringement lawsuits in Pennsylvania – in just one day! For any other type of Plaintiff, this would be extraordinarily difficult, however, Strike 3 Holdings manages to do so because each lawsuit is nearly identical. They allege their investigators observed an IP address repeatedly downloading the Plaintiff’s copyrighted works through BitTorrent networks and then sues each IP address for copyright infringement.

But, an IP address is just a unique identifier for an internet connection. In order to find the proper defendant, that is the person that actually downloaded the files, the Plaintiff subpoenas the Internet Service Provider (e.g., CenturyLink, Charter/Spectrum, XFinity/Comcast, Cox, Optimum/Altice, RCN, Verizon, etc.) for the subscriber’s identity. Some judges have noted that it’s dubious to assume the internet subscriber (the person that pays the bill) is the same person who downloaded the material. After all, many homes have multiple people who use the same internet connection – and unauthorized use can occur. Some subscribers may not even live at the residence the internet is being provided for, such as with landlords.

Yet, courts across the country have granted tremendous leeway to Strike 3 Holdings to allow them to get the identities of internet subscribers to try to find a person willing to pay a settlement. The settlement amounts are carefully calculated to be just below the cost of an effective defense.

Most subscribers find out about the lawsuit when they receive a notice from their Internet Service Provider (ISP) notifying them that Strike 3 Holdings has subpoenaed the subscriber’s identity. The ISP is obligated to comply with the subpoena unless a Motion to Quash is filed. This is a court motion to void or “quash” the subpoena. However, Motions to Quash are complex in these cases as the subpoena is between the Plaintiff and the ISP, meaning the subscriber is a third party. I’m happy to discuss with you whether filing a Motion to Quash or alternative motions is advisable in your case.

If you’ve received one of these notices or have been served with the lawsuit, it’s vital to retain counsel without delay. There are timelines imposed by the court that must be adhered to in order to defend yourself. This Plaintiff is notoriously aggressive and an effective defense can help secure the best possible outcome for you. Failing to respond in court once you have been served can result in a default judgement against you. Default judgments typically involve ruling in the Plaintiff’s favor and awarding thousands of dollars in damages per infringement in addition to the Plaintiff’s legal fees and costs.

For more information on what these lawsuits mean for internet subscribers, please check out our FAQ section.

[Read more…] about Strike 3 Holdings Files 25 Cases in Pennsylvania in 1 Day

Filed Under: Bittorrent, By Plaintiff, Cablevision Subpoena, Cases, Comcast Subpoena, Copyright, Cox, Federal, Motion to Quash, Optimum Online, Pennsylvania, States, Strike 3 Holdings, Strike3 Holdings, Subpoena, Summons, Time Warner Subpoena, Verizon Subpoena Tagged With: bittorrent, charter, comcast, cox, file sharing, lawsuit, motion to quash, optimum online, Pennsylvania, RCN, strike 3 holdings, summons, time warner, verizon

June 22, 2019 by Leonard J. French

Strike 3 Holdings files 88 Cases in Colorado, Maryland, New Jersey, and New York – Over Just 3 Days!

Important – If You’ve Received a Notice from Strike 3 Holdings – Read This!

On June 18, 19, and 20, Strike 3 Holdings filed 88 new lawsuits in Colorado (14 cases), Maryland (21 cases), New Jersey (28 cases), and New York (25 cases). Strike 3 Holdings owns the rights to Vixen, Tushy, and Blacked brand adult films and is known for suing individuals associated with an IP address they alleged downloaded their films through BitTorrent networks.

For any other type of Plaintiff, filing 88 lawsuits in 3 days would be a massive undertaking, however, Strike 3 Holdings can file so many lawsuits because each one is nearly identical. They allege their investigators observed an IP address repeatedly downloading the Plaintiff’s copyrighted works through BitTorrent networks and then sues each IP address for copyright infringement.

But, an IP address is just a unique identifier for an internet connection. In order to find the proper defendant, that is the person that actually infringed the Plaintiff’s copyright, the Plaintiff subpoenas the Internet Service Provider (e.g., Charter, Comcast, Optimum Online, RCN, Spectrum, Time Warner Cable, etc.) for the subscriber’s identity. Some judges have noted that it’s tenuous to equate the internet subscriber (the person that pays the bill) and the person who actually downloaded the material. After all, many homes have multiple people who use the same internet connection – sometimes even those without permission may access a poorly secured wifi connection. Some subscribers may not even live at the residence the internet is being provided for, such as with some landlords.

Yet, courts across the country have granted tremendous leeway to Strike 3 Holdings to allow them to get the identities of internet subscribers to try to find a person willing to pay a settlement. The settlement amounts are carefully calculated to be just below the cost of an effective defense.

Most subscribers find out about the lawsuit when they receive a notice from their Internet Service Provider (ISP) notifying them the ISP has received a subpoena from Strike 3 to discover the subscriber’s identity. The ISP is obligated to comply with the subpoena unless a Motion to Quash is filed. This is a court motion to void or “quash” the subpoena. However, Motions to Quash are complex in these cases as the subpoena is between the Plaintiff and the ISP, meaning the subscriber is a third party. I’m happy to discuss with you whether filing a Motion to Quash or alternative motions is advisable in your case.

If you’ve received one of these notices or have even been served with the lawsuit, it’s vital to retain counsel without delay. This Plaintiff is notoriously aggressive and an effective defense can help secure the best possible outcome for you. If you do not try to fight the subpoena, you may be served with the complaint – meaning you usually have 21 days to respond in Federal court or risk a default judgement. Default judgments typically involve ruling in the Plaintiff’s favor and awarding thousands of dollars in damages per infringement in addition to the Plaintiff’s legal fees and costs.

For more information on what these lawsuits mean for internet subscribers, please check out our FAQ section.

[Read more…] about Strike 3 Holdings files 88 Cases in Colorado, Maryland, New Jersey, and New York – Over Just 3 Days!

Filed Under: Bittorrent, By Plaintiff, Cablevision Subpoena, Cases, Colorado, Comcast Subpoena, Copyright, Federal, Maryland, Motion to Quash, New Jersey, New York, Optimum Online, States, Strike 3 Holdings, Strike3 Holdings, Subpoena, Summons, Time Warner Subpoena, Verizon Subpoena Tagged With: bittorrent, charter, colorado, comcast, file sharing, lawsuit, Maryland, motion to quash, New Jersey, New York, optimum online, RCN, strike 3 holdings, summons, time warner, verizon

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Page 13
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 19
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Subpoena or Summons?

Received a notice of a subpoena to your ISP? Received a federal court summons? Attorney & Counselor Leonard J. French can help.

You can talk to me directly. Call or text me now at 610-466-5644.

Read more in my subpoena defense guide…

Motion to Quash

Your Notice from your ISP may tell you to file a “Motion to Quash”. I can tell you what that is and whether filing a Motion to Quash is the right decision for you.

CALL/TEXT NOW: (610) 466-5644

These cases are serious. I can answer your questions. I can help you sleep again.

I handle your case – personally – from start to finish. See for yourself: call and talk to me now.

Experience & Full Service

I have personally represented over fifteen hundred defendants in bittorrent-based copyright lawsuits around the country, including Malibu Media’s first trial, the ‘bellwether’ trial, and Strike 3’s first jury trial (settled on the eve of trial).

Call me at (610) 466-5644 anytime. If I can’t answer, please leave a message and I will call you back as soon as I can – even nights and weekends.

I offer reasonable, flat rates for most circumstances. Most rates range from $1,200 to $2,500 depending on the complexity of the case.

Contact me now:

    “really helped me understand”

    "It was an awesome decision to ask for help regarding copyright defense from Leonard J French. His insight and advice helped me through the situation with no bumps in the road. His services are very fairly priced, and his initial, free phone consultation was much longer than I expected, which really helped me understand the situation at hand before we even began to talk money. I would highly recommend Mr. French for any legal matters his firm covers."
    - a Copyright client

    "If you are in need of a Lawyer, do not hesitate to hire Mr. French. Kind, Compassionate and Knowledgeable."
    - Andrew

    More Testimonials

    Notice of subpoena to ISP?

    If you have received a notice that your internet service provider has been subpoenaed in a lawsuit, you may still have time to protect your identity and keep your anonymity.

    Many defendants have to make the tough decision about fighting or settling their case. There are many details which determine the outcome of one of these cases.

    Call me now and I will help you understand where you are and how to best proceed.

    (888) 801-8681 anytime.

    Most Recent Updates

    • Strike 3 Holdings hits California internet users with 61 new lawsuits January 23, 2025
    • Understanding Strike 3 Holdings, LLC Lawsuits: What You Need to Know January 14, 2025
    • What to Do If You’ve Received a Copyright Infringement Notice from Strike 3 Holdings January 8, 2025
    • Received a subpoena? Please read this guide. January 8, 2025
    • Strike 3 Holdings files 11 new cases in Kentucky. November 18, 2024
    • Strike 3 Holdings files 19 new cases in the Eastern District of Texas. November 18, 2024
    • Strike 3 Holdings files 9 new cases in Tennessee. November 18, 2024
    • Strike 3 Holdings files 14 new cases in the Eastern District of North Carolina. November 18, 2024
    • Strike 3 Holdings files 9 new cases in the Middle District of Pennsylvania November 18, 2024
    • Strike 3 Holdings files 22 new cases in Minnesota. November 18, 2024

    Case Update Calendar

    May 2025
    M T W T F S S
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  
    « Jan    

    Footer

     
    Call now: 888-801-8681

    This is Attorney Advertising
    • Home
    • F.A.Q.
    • California
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • D.C.
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Hawaii
    • Illinois
    • Kentucky
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Minnesota
    • New Jersey
    • New York
    • North Carolina
    • Ohio
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Texas
    • Virginia
    • Wisconsin

    Copyright © 2025 · Executive Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in